Swift Documentation, Release . The names public and private have precedent in many languages; internal comes from C#. It is possible that the ease of higher-order programming in Swift might ameliorate many of. supportive environment and Swift programming language from Apple. XCode – Apple native integrated development environment. Swift Programming: The Big Nerd Ranch Guide by Matthew Mathias and John .. Swift Programming viii language called Swift for the development of iOS and OS X applications. As a new .. Listing Adding “Four” and 2 import Cocoa.
|Language:||English, Spanish, Dutch|
|ePub File Size:||15.75 MB|
|PDF File Size:||18.21 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Regsitration Required]|
The Swift Programming Language is the authoritative reference for Swift, offering a guided tour, a comprehensive guide, and a formal reference of the language. Swift is a fantastic way to write software, whether it's for phones, desktops, It's a safe, fast, and interactive programming language that combines the best in. Swift is a new programming language for iOS and OS X apps that builds on the best of Apple laid the foundation for Swift by advancing our existing compiler.
You can also clone Ninja next to the other projects and it will be bootstrapped automatically: Mar 23, Version Compatibility. Retrieved October 28, In Objective-C, and most other languages implementing the protocol concept, it is up to the programmer to ensure that the required methods are implemented in each class. More options may be added over time. You can do that by running the following command:.
Optional types are created with the Optional mechanism—to make an Integer that is nullable, one would use a declaration similar to var optionalInteger: As in C ,  Swift also includes syntactic sugar for this, allowing one to indicate a variable is optional by placing a question mark after the type name, var optionalInteger: Optional types wrap the base type, resulting in a different instance.
String and String? To access the value inside, assuming it is not nil, it must be unwrapped to expose the instance inside. This is performed with the! In this case, the!
If anOptionalInstance is nil, a null-pointer error occurs. This can be annoying in practice, so Swift also includes the concept of optional chaining to test whether the instance is nil and then unwrap it if it is non-null:. In this case the runtime only calls someMethod if anOptionalInstance is not nil, suppressing the error.
Normally this requires the programmer to test whether myValue is nil before proceeding. For instance:. Swift 2 introduced the new keyword guard for cases in which code should stop executing if some condition is unmet:. Using guard has three benefits. While the syntax can act as an if statement, its primary benefit is inferring non-nullability.
Where an if statement requires a case, guard assumes the case based on the condition provided. Also, since guard contains no scope, with exception of the else closure, leaseStart is presented as an unwrapped optional to the guard's super-scope. Lastly, if the guard statement's test fails, Swift requires the else to exit the current method or loop, ensuring leaseStart never is accessed when nil. This is performed with the keywords return , continue , break , or throw.
Objective-C was weakly typed, and allowed any method to be called on any object at any time. If the method call failed, there was a default handler in the runtime that returned nil. That meant that no unwrapping or testing was needed, the equivalent statement in Objective-C:. However, this also demanded that all method calls be dynamic, which introduces significant overhead. Swift's use of optionals provides a similar mechanism for testing and dealing with nils, but does so in a way that allows the compiler to use static dispatch because the unwrapping action is called on a defined instance the wrapper , versus occurring in the runtime dispatch system.
In many object-oriented languages, objects are represented internally in two parts. The object is stored as a block of data placed on the heap , while the name or "handle" to that object is represented by a pointer.
Objects are passed between methods by copying the value of the pointer, allowing the same underlying data on the heap to be accessed by anyone with a copy. In contrast, basic types like integers and floating point values are represented directly; the handle contains the data, not a pointer to it, and that data is passed directly to methods by copying. These styles of access are termed pass-by-reference in the case of objects, and pass-by-value for basic types.
Both concepts have their advantages and disadvantages. Objects are useful when the data is large, like the description of a window or the contents of a document. In these cases, access to that data is provided by copying a or bit value, versus copying an entire data structure. However, smaller values like integers are the same size as pointers typically both are one word , so there is no advantage to passing a pointer, versus passing the value.
Also, pass-by-reference inherently requires a dereferencing operation, which can produce noticeable overhead in some operations, typically those used with these basic value types, like mathematics. Similarly to C and in contrast to most other OO languages, [ citation needed ] Swift offers built-in support for objects using either pass-by-reference or pass-by-value semantics, the former using the class declaration and the latter using struct.
Structs in Swift have almost all the same features as classes: For this reason, Apple terms all data generically as instances , versus objects or values. Structs do not support inheritance, however. The programmer is free to choose which semantics are more appropriate for each data structure in the application.
Larger structures like windows would be defined as classes, allowing them to be passed around as pointers. Smaller structures, like a 2D point, can be defined as structs, which will be pass-by-value and allow direct access to their internal data with no dereference. The performance improvement inherent to the pass-by-value concept is such that Swift uses these types for almost all common data types, including Int and Double , and types normally represented by objects, like String and Array.
To ensure that even the largest structs do not cause a performance penalty when they are handed off, Swift uses copy on write so that the objects are copied only if and when the program attempts to change a value in them. This means that the various accessors have what is in effect a pointer to the same data storage, but this takes place far below the level of the language, in the computer's memory management unit MMU.
So while the data is physically stored as one instance in memory, at the level of the application, these values are separate, and physical separation is enforced by copy on write only if needed.
A key feature of Objective-C is its support for categories , methods that can be added to extend classes at runtime. Categories allow extending classes in-place to add new functions with no need to subclass or even have access to the original source code.
An example might be to add spell checker support to the base NSString class, which means all instances of NSString in the application gain spell checking. The system is also widely used as an organizational technique, allowing related code to be gathered into library-like extensions.
Swift continues to support this concept, although they are now termed extensions , and declared with the keyword extension. Unlike Objective-C, Swift can also add new properties accessors, types and enums to extant instances.
Another key feature of Objective-C is its use of protocols , known in most modern languages as interfaces. Protocols promise that a particular class implements a set of methods, meaning that other objects in the system can call those methods on any object supporting that protocol.
This is often used in modern OO languages as a substitute for multiple inheritance , although the feature sets are not entirely similar. A common example of a protocol in Cocoa is the NSCopying protocol, which defines one method, copyWithZone , that implements deep copying on objects. In Objective-C, and most other languages implementing the protocol concept, it is up to the programmer to ensure that the required methods are implemented in each class. Combined, these allow protocols to be written once and support a wide variety of instances.
Also, the extension mechanism can be used to add protocol conformance to an object that does not list that protocol in its definition. For example, a protocol might be declared called StringConvertible , which ensures that instances that conform to the protocol implement a toString method that returns a String. In Swift, this can be declared with code like this:. In Swift, like many modern languages supporting interfaces, protocols can be used as types, which means variables and methods can be defined by protocol instead of their specific type:.
It does not matter what sort of instance someSortOfPrintableObject is, the compiler will ensure that it conforms to the protocol and thus this code is safe. As Swift treats structs and classes as similar concepts, both extensions and protocols are extensively used in Swift's runtime to provide a rich API based on structs.
A concrete example of how all of these features interact can be seen in the concept of default protocol implementations:. This function defines a method that works on any instance conforming to Equatable , providing a not equals function.
Any instance, class or struct, automatically gains this implementation simply by conforming to Equatable. As many instances gain Equatable through their base implementations or other generic extensions, most basic objects in the runtime gain equals and not equals with no code. This combination of protocols, defaults, protocol inheritance, and extensions allows many of the functions normally associated with classes and inheritance to be implemented on value types.
This concept is so widely used within Swift, that Apple has begun calling it a protocol-oriented programming language. They suggest addressing many of the problem domains normally solved though classes and inheritance using protocols and structs instead.
To aid development of such programs, and the re-use of extant code, Xcode 6 and higher offers a semi-automated system that builds and maintains a bridging header to expose Objective-C code to Swift. This takes the form of an additional header file that simply defines or imports all of the Objective-C symbols that are needed by the project's Swift code. It helps to save this directory as an environment variable for future use.
Once the first build has completed, Ninja can perform fast incremental builds of various products.
These incremental builds are a big timesaver when developing and debugging. This will build the Swift compiler, but will not rebuild the standard library or any other target.
Building the swift-stdlib target as an additional layer of testing from time to time is also a good idea. To build just the standard library, run:. It will auto-create a lot of schemes for all of the available targets. A common debug flow would involve:. Another option is to change the scheme to "Wait for executable to be launched", then run the build product in Terminal.
Swift toolchains are created using the script build-toolchain. This script is used by swift.
It will be created in the directory you run the script with a filename of the form: Beyond building the toolchain, build-toolchain also supports the following non-exhaustive set of useful options More options may be added over time. Please pass --help to build-toolchain to see the full set of options.
The script also generates an archive containing debug symbols which can be installed over the main archive allowing symbolication of any compiler crashes. If you have changed Xcode versions but still encounter errors that appear to be related to the Xcode version, try passing --clean to build-script.
When a new version of Xcode is released, you can update your build without recompiling the entire project by passing the --reconfigure option. Make sure all repositories are up to date with the update-checkout command described above. Be sure to look through the docs directory for more information about the compiler. In particular, the documents titled Debugging the Swift Compiler and Continuous Integration for Swift are very helpful to understand before submitting your first PR.
To read the compiler documentation, start by installing the Sphinx documentation generator tool by running the command:.
Once complete, you can build the Swift documentation by changing directory into docs and typing make. This compiles the. Many of the docs are out of date, but you can see some historical design documents in the docs directory. Another source of documentation is the standard library itself, located in stdlib. Much of the language is actually implemented in the library including Int , and the standard library gives some examples of what can be expressed today.
CMake is the core infrastructure used to configure builds of Swift and its companion projects; at least version 3. On Linux, if you have not already installed Swift's development dependencies , you can download and install the CMake package separately using the following command:.
Ninja is the current recommended build system for building Swift and is the default configuration generated by CMake. Pre-built packages are available for macOS and Linux distributions. You can also clone Ninja next to the other projects and it will be bootstrapped automatically:. Skip to content. Dismiss Join GitHub today GitHub is home to over 31 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign up. The Swift Programming Language https: Find File. Download ZIP. Sign in Sign up. Launching GitHub Desktop Go back. Launching Xcode Launching Visual Studio Latest commit Apr 15, Contributing to Swift Contributions to Swift are welcomed and encouraged! Getting Started These instructions give the most direct path to a working Swift development environment. Continue reading for more information about how to do this yourself.
The first step in the process of proposing a change to Swift always involves pitching your idea in the Swift forums. In these forums, members of the Swift core team, along with the rest of the community, will give you feedback on your idea and help you assess if it could fit into the language. After you gauge the interest in your idea, you can proceed by formalizing your pitch in the form of a full proposal.
Swift proposals are managed in their own separate repository, swift-evolution. There is a proposal template for changes in Swift, and it contains all the important parts that should not be missed during review: For complex changes, I recommend you spend your time writing a well-thought-out proposal, as it will increase your chances that the change will be accepted.
The Swift programming language uses GitHub to manage all the code contributions. You can install both of these from Homebrew:. Once you have downloaded the source code to your local machine, I recommend doing a full build to check that everything works as expected.
In order to not spend excessive time compiling, if you are planning to contribute to the Swift language itself and not the standard library, for example , you can compile Swift without optimizations and the rest of the codebase with optimizations and debug information to facilitate debugging. You can do that by running the following command:. Inside the bin directory, you can find the Swift compiler itself, along with some interesting tools — like swift-ide-test or swift-refactor — that are not part of an official toolchain.
Most of these binaries are used by integration tests to test some parts of the codebase.